Multidisciplinary Staged Management of a Complex Zygomatico-Buccal Abscess in a Diabetic High-Risk Gravida: A Case Report

Article information

J Wound Manag Res. 2026;22(2):106-112
Publication date (electronic) : 2026 June 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.22467/jwmr.2026.03545
1Division of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Central General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia
2Division of Fetomaternal, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Central General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia
3Division of Endocrine, Metabolic, and Diabetes, Department of Internal Medicine, Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Central General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine Sriwijaya University, Palembang, Indonesia
Corresponding author: Mufida Muzakkie, PhD, Division of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery, Dr. Mohammad Hoesin Central General Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Sriwijaya University, Jalan Jenderal Sudirman Kilometer 3.5, Palembang 30126, Indonesia, E-mail: mufida.muzakkie@gmail.com
Received 2026 January 23; Revised 2026 March 10; Accepted 2026 March 11.

Abstract

Severe soft tissue infections (SSTIs) in pregnancy are rare yet life-threatening, particularly when exacerbated by diabetes-induced immune dysfunction and impaired wound healing. We report a 35-year-old multigravida (G4P2A1) at 31 weeks’ gestation presenting with a rapidly progressing zygomatico-buccal abscess, poorly controlled type 2 diabetes, and a history of recurrent fetal loss. Admission findings confirmed systemic infection, severe metabolic derangement, and threatened preterm labor. A prioritized clinical protocol was implemented: initial management focused on metabolic stabilization through intensive glycemic control and obstetric optimization via tocolysis and antenatal corticosteroids. Following stabilization, surgical debridement and culture-guided antimicrobial therapy were performed, followed by phase-adapted wound care. This integrated approach achieved favorable maternal and fetal outcomes, emphasizing that successful management of complex SSTIs in high-risk pregnancies necessitates a carefully timed, collaborative strategy rather than isolated interventions.

Introduction

Diabetes mellitus inherently impairs wound healing through microvascular dysfunction, defective angiogenesis, and immune dysregulation, leading to diminished tissue perfusion and heightened infection risk [1]. Altered growth factor expression disrupts re-epithelialization, making diabetic wounds prone to rapid progression [1]. While infections in the maxillofacial region generally spread easily along fascial planes and endanger vital structures [2], this process is significantly accelerated in diabetic patients, necessitating early surgical source control. Surgical management of maxillofacial infections during pregnancy carries the unique challenge of caring simultaneously for two patients, as pregnancy induces complex physiological changes that heighten maternal and fetal vulnerability [3]. Non-obstetric surgeries during pregnancy carry inherent risks, including the potential for preterm labor. Consequently, surgical decision-making must balance urgent source control against maternal-fetal hazards, favoring well-timed interventions and tissue preservation [4].

Herein, we report a case of a 35-year-old pregnant woman with diabetes mellitus who developed a complex maxillofacial infection, highlighting the diagnostic and management challenges in this high-risk clinical setting. The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Mohammad Hosein Central General Hospital (IRB No. DP.04.03/D.XVIII.06.08/ETIK/024/2026). Written informed consent was secured from the patient, including permission to use and publish clinical images.

Case

A 35-year-old multigravida (G4P2A1) at 31 weeks’ gestation presented with a rapidly progressing right zygomatico-buccal abscess. Her medical history included poorly controlled type 2 diabetes mellitus and a high-risk obstetric background including two intrauterine fetal demises and one spontaneous abortion; notably, one prior loss was triggered by a similar infection. Clinical examination revealed a high-burden infection, clinically defined by a 35 cm2 tense, fluctuant purulent collection with ill-defined borders and extensive induration, indicating surrounding cellulitis (Fig. 1). Advanced imaging was initially deferred to prioritize immediate metabolic stabilization. Initial vital signs demonstrated a blood pressure of 120/60 mmHg, heart rate of 110 beats/min, respiratory rate of 18 breaths/min, and temperature of 36.7 °C. Laboratory and arterial blood gas findings collectively confirmed systemic infection and severe metabolic derangement, characterized by marked hyperglycemia (blood sugar level 266 mg/dL, hemoglobin A1c 7.7%), leukocytosis (white blood cell count 24.92×103/µL, 88% neutrophils), anemia (9 g/dL), and partially compensated metabolic acidosis (pH 7.253, bicarbonate 9.6 mmol/L, base deficit – 17.8 mmol/L). Ultrasonography showed cervical shortening, indicative of threatened preterm labor. The diagnosis comprised a complex right zygomatico-buccal soft tissue abscess in the context of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, metabolic instability, and high-risk pregnancy. A history of prior adverse pregnancy outcomes established live birth as a shared primary objective.

Fig. 1

Clinical photograph of the preoperative right zygomatico-buccal abscess.

Management followed a prioritized clinical pathway, with the hospitalization course and interventions outlined in Table 1. During days 1–3, surgical intervention was strategically deferred to optimize the patient’s clinical status via intravenous insulin, tocolysis, and antenatal corticosteroids. To counteract the predictable steroid-induced hyperglycemia, rigorous intravenous insulin titration was maintained to keep blood glucose levels strictly within target ranges. Empirical intravenous ceftriaxone (1 g every 12 hours) and metronidazole were initiated on day 1 to mitigate the risk of deep-space extension. Following general stabilization, definitive surgical debridement was performed on day 4. The procedure consisted of incision, drainage, and meticulous excision of non-viable tissue until a healthy, bleeding wound bed was achieved, while ensuring the preservation of vital facial structures (Fig. 2). Surgery was performed under general anesthesia without neuromuscular blocking agents to minimize physiological stress, facilitate continuous intraoperative fetal monitoring, and ensure rapid maternal recovery. Transient intraoperative fetal heart rate decelerations were detected via cardiotocography and promptly resolved through maternal repositioning and fluid resuscitation.

Timeline of key clinical status and multidisciplinary management during hospitalization

Fig. 2

Immediate postoperative clinical photography.

Histopathologic evaluation of intraoperative specimens confirmed pseudoepitheliomatous hyperplasia with suppurative granulomatous inflammation, verifying deep dermal involvement and excluding malignancy. Intraoperative cultures yielded Staphylococcus aureus (Gram-positive cocci 4+), guiding the transition from metronidazole to targeted oral clindamycin (300 mg every 8 hours) while continuing ceftriaxone. Postoperative wound care utilized a phase-based strategy (Table 2). During the inflammatory phase (postoperative day [POD] 1–7), alginate dressings were used to manage the high volumes of exudate. The apparent clinical worsening and increased edema observed on POD 3 were identified as the physiological peak of the inflammatory response—exacerbated by the patient’s diabetic state—rather than treatment failure. Therapy then transitioned to honey-based dressings (POD 8–11) to promote epithelialization until discharge on day 12 (Fig. 3).

Phase-based postoperative wound care strategy and clinical rationale

Fig. 3

Short-term wound healing following right zygomatico-buccal abscess debridement. (A) Postoperative day 3; (B) postoperative day 7; (C) postoperative day 10; (D) postoperative day 12.

Wound closure was deliberately managed via secondary intention over the course of 9 weeks. Surgical closure techniques, such as local flaps or skin grafts, were deferred to minimize additional surgical stress during pregnancy and to avoid the high risk of graft failure in an infected diabetic wound bed. At discharge, the patient demonstrated stable glycemic control and reassuring fetal well-being. The patient subsequently delivered a healthy infant at 40 weeks’ gestation via elective cesarean section without neonatal complications (Fig. 4). Long-term follow-up at 18 months confirmed stable outcomes, complete wound closure, minimal keloid formation, and no functional impairment (Fig. 5).

Fig. 4

Mid-term wound healing following right zygomatico-buccal abscess debridement. (A) Four weeks postoperatively, with established granulation tissue and wound contraction. (B) Six weeks postoperatively, showing ongoing epithelialization. (C) Eight weeks postoperatively, demonstrating stable wound healing and maturation. (D) Pre-cesarean section at 9 weeks postoperatively, demonstrating incomplete epithelialization.

Fig. 5

Long-term follow-up at 18 months showing complete wound closure.

Discussion

Synthesizing the authors’ clinical experience with the findings of this case, it is evident that management of complex maxillofacial wounds in diabetic gravidas hinges on integrating five pillars: rigorous glycemic control, optimal surgical timing, thorough debridement, targeted antimicrobials, and phase-adapted wound care (Fig. 6).

Fig. 6

Multidisciplinary framework for complex maxillofacial infection management in pregnancy.

SSTIs account for 12.3% of global pregnancy-related infections, with diabetes increasing this vulnerability 3-fold and independently predicting larger abscesses. This patient’s 35 cm2 abscess aligns with trends in which diabetic lesions significantly exceed non-diabetic averages [5]. Since impaired neutrophil function and vascular complications in diabetic gravidas necessitate aggressive management, targeting S. aureus, the predominant pathogen in such cases, is imperative [5,6].

Deferring surgery for metabolic stabilization was mandatory; the intraoperative mortality risk from uncorrected acidosis and electrolyte imbalance heavily outweighed the theoretical risk of infectious spread. According to Sudhakaran, elective surgery is contraindicated in patients presenting with acute metabolic abnormalities [7]. Furthermore, Sweitzer [8] has stated in a recent publication that an arterial pH <7.3 and HCO3 <18 mEq/L represent critical physiological thresholds; proceeding with surgery under such uncorrected acidosis significantly increases the risk of 30-day mortality. Prioritizing preoperative optimization to achieve glycemic targets has been shown to reduce perioperative complications substantially.

The empiric initiation and subsequent adjustment of antibiotics were guided by safety profiles in the third trimester. Ceftriaxone demonstrates comparable benefits to standard cephalosporins in pregnancy, while clindamycin shows high target attainment in both maternal serum and umbilical cord blood (96%), ensuring adequate therapeutic levels without requiring dosage adjustments [9,10]. Furthermore, the literature confirms that metronidazole exposure is not associated with adverse delivery outcomes such as preterm birth or stillbirth [11].

The clinical course aligns with existing literature on diabetic wound biology, while emphasizing pregnancy-specific adaptations. Diabetes is known to cause profound immune dysregulation and alters key proteins necessary for tissue repair, promoting rapid progression and secondary infection [1]. Epidemiologically, severe head and neck infections in pregnancy carry critical risks; a systematic review of 69 case reports reported a 37.7% adverse outcome rate, necessitating emergency cesarean sections in 13% of cases to mitigate life-threatening hazards [12]. Aksoy et al. [2] identified diabetes as a key risk factor for extensive deep neck infections requiring early drainage; however, pregnancy necessitated timing adjustments for maternal stabilization and antenatal corticosteroids in our case.

Following infection control, phase-adapted wound management utilizing honey-based dressings offered substantial antimicrobial and pro-granulation benefits [1,13]. Fig. 7 outlines a proposed clinical pathway synthesized by the authors. This algorithm adapts severe soft tissue infection management guidelines [14,15] and evidence-based diabetic wound care [1,13] for the specific physiological demands of diabetic pregnancies. Specifically, the pathway emphasizes the early recognition of systemic toxicity and the absolute prioritization of prompt surgical source control (incision and drainage), which are fundamental in managing severe purulent infections [14]. Furthermore, adjuvant antimicrobial therapy is strictly indicated when the infection is complicated by a systemic inflammatory response or diabetes-induced immunodeficiency [15]. In such clinical scenarios, targeted oral clindamycin serves as a highly recommended treatment option once the isolate is confirmed to be susceptible [15].

Fig. 7

Management of severe soft tissue infection in pregnant diabetic patients. SSTI, severe soft tissue infection; ICU, intensive care unit; CTG, cardiotocography [1,13-15].

In conclusion, managing severe maxillofacial infections in pregnant diabetic patients requires a delicate balance between immediate surgical source control and maternal-fetal physiological limits. By prioritizing metabolic stabilization prior to surgical debridement, anticipating the glycemic impact of obstetric steroids, and employing safe, culture-guided antimicrobials, clinicians can effectively eradicate the infection. This collaborative approach ensures favorable wound healing without compromising the continuation of the pregnancy.

Notes

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

1. Beginanta VA, Perdanakusuma DS, Ervianti E, et al. Chronic wounds: risk factors and evidence-based intervention. Jurnal Rekonstruksi dan Estetik 2025;10:56–66.
2. Aksoy A, Demirkiran BB, Bora A, et al. Comprehensive evaluation of deep neck infections: a retrospective analysis of 111 cases. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol 2024;9:e70027.
3. Haggerty E, Daly J. Anaesthesia and non-obstetric surgery in pregnancy. BJA Educ 2021;21:42–3.
4. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Obstetric Practice. ACOG Committee Opinion Number 775 [Internet] American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists; c2017. [cited 2026 Jan 1]. Available from: https://www.acog.org/clinical/clinical-guidance/committee-opinion/articles/2019/04/nonobstetric-surgery-during-pregnancy.
5. Cheng S, Poh BR, Tay VWY, et al. The interplay between diabetes mellitus and soft tissue infections in general surgical patients. BMC Endocr Disord 2024;24:106.
6. Ribeiro-do-Valle CC, Bonet M, Brizuela V, et al. Aetiology and use of antibiotics in pregnancy-related infections: results of the WHO Global Maternal Sepsis Study (GLOSS), 1-week inception cohort. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob 2024;23:21.
7. Sudhakaran S, Surani SR. Guidelines for perioperative management of the diabetic patient. Surg Res Pract 2015;2015:284063.
8. Sweitzer B. Preoperative medicine: evaluating and optimizing patients before anesthesia and surgery. Anesthesiol Perioper Sci 2026(4):9.
9. Groen F, Prins JR, Hooge MNL, et al. The pharmacokinetics and target attainment of antimicrobial drugs throughout pregnancy: part III non-penicillin and non-cephalosporin drugs. Clin Pharmacokinet 2023;62:399–434.
10. Li Y, Zhang C, Huang X, et al. Effect of antimicrobial exposure in pregnancy on adverse pregnancy outcomes and admission rate to the neonatal intensive care unit: a multi-center cohort study. Infect Drug Resist 2023;16:2441–51.
11. Ajiji P, Uzunali A, Ripoche E, et al. Investigating the efficacy and safety of metronidazole during pregnancy; a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X 2021;11:100128.
12. Pucci R, Cassoni A, Di Carlo D, et al. Severe odontogenic infections during pregnancy and related adverse outcomes: case report and systematic literature review. Trop Med Infect Dis 2021(6):106.
13. Polk C, Sampson MM, Roshdy D, et al. Skin and soft tissue infections in patients with diabetes mellitus. Infect Dis Clin North Am 2021;35:183–97.
14. California Correctional Health Care Services (CCHCS). Skin and soft tissue infections: care guide [Internet] CCHCS; c2025. [cited 2026 Jan 1]. Available from: https://cchcs.ca.gov/wp-content/uploads/sites/60/SSTI-CG.pdf.
15. Brown NM, Goodman AL, Horner C, et al. Treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): updated guidelines from the UK. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2021;3:dlaa114.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1

Clinical photograph of the preoperative right zygomatico-buccal abscess.

Table 1

Timeline of key clinical status and multidisciplinary management during hospitalization

Hospital day Clinical status Key interventions
Day 1 Admission: maxillofacial abscess, hyperglycemia, metabolic acidosis, threatened preterm labor Lab work-up; empirical IV ceftriaxone/metronidazole; intensive insulin therapy
Day 2–3 Systemic stabilization; persistent localized infection Glycemic & electrolyte correction; tocolysis; antenatal corticosteroids
Day 4 Metabolic & obstetric stability achieved Definitive incision, drainage, & debridement (under GA, continuous CTG)
Day 5–7 Early recovery; exudative wound phase Culture-guided antibiotics (clindamycin); daily wound assessment
Day 8–11 Proliferative wound-healing phase Transition to honey-based advanced dressings; glycemic optimization
Day 12 Stable maternal-fetal status; wound maturation Discharge; structured outpatient follow-up plan

IV, intravenous; GA, general anesthesia; CTG, cardiotocography.

Fig. 2

Immediate postoperative clinical photography.

Fig. 3

Short-term wound healing following right zygomatico-buccal abscess debridement. (A) Postoperative day 3; (B) postoperative day 7; (C) postoperative day 10; (D) postoperative day 12.

Table 2

Phase-based postoperative wound care strategy and clinical rationale

POD Healing phase Modality Clinical rationale and monitoring
POD 1–3 Inflammatory/exudative Alginate dressing Manage high exudate; prevent maceration; monitor for residual infection
POD 4–7 Early granulation Alginate dressing Maintain clean environment; confirm infection control and reduction in drainage
POD 8–11 Established granulation Honey-based dressing Antimicrobial effect; promote moist healing, granulation, and epithelialization
Discharge Maturation Honey-based dressing Support secondary intention healing and wound contraction during outpatient follow-up

POD, postoperative day.

Fig. 4

Mid-term wound healing following right zygomatico-buccal abscess debridement. (A) Four weeks postoperatively, with established granulation tissue and wound contraction. (B) Six weeks postoperatively, showing ongoing epithelialization. (C) Eight weeks postoperatively, demonstrating stable wound healing and maturation. (D) Pre-cesarean section at 9 weeks postoperatively, demonstrating incomplete epithelialization.

Fig. 5

Long-term follow-up at 18 months showing complete wound closure.

Fig. 6

Multidisciplinary framework for complex maxillofacial infection management in pregnancy.

Fig. 7

Management of severe soft tissue infection in pregnant diabetic patients. SSTI, severe soft tissue infection; ICU, intensive care unit; CTG, cardiotocography [1,13-15].